<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Opera was installed how?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arfore.com/2009/07/24/opera-was-installed-how/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arfore.com/2009/07/24/opera-was-installed-how/</link>
	<description>welcome to the foremind</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 02:28:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacques Lemans</title>
		<link>http://arfore.com/2009/07/24/opera-was-installed-how/comment-page-1/#comment-944</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacques Lemans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 13:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arfore.com/?p=320#comment-944</guid>
		<description>While the Adobe Uninstaller doesn&#039;t remove them, appzapper isn&#039;t really much use either.  What we don&#039;t know is the &quot;why&quot; behind the inclusion of the versions of Opera in the Adobe applications.

I can see it being necessary depending on how the apps are written, but I would definitely not recommend removing them from the internal resources of the application bundle without knowing what they are used for.; While the Adobe Uninstaller doesn&#039;t remove them, appzapper isn&#039;t really much use either.  What we don&#039;t know is the &quot;why&quot; behind the inclusion of the versions of Opera in the Adobe applications.

I can see it being necessary depending on how the apps are written, but I would definitely not recommend removing them from the internal resources of the application bundle without knowing what they are used for.;;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While the Adobe Uninstaller doesn&#39;t remove them, appzapper isn&#39;t really much use either.  What we don&#39;t know is the &quot;why&quot; behind the inclusion of the versions of Opera in the Adobe applications.</p>
<p>I can see it being necessary depending on how the apps are written, but I would definitely not recommend removing them from the internal resources of the application bundle without knowing what they are used for.; While the Adobe Uninstaller doesn&#39;t remove them, appzapper isn&#39;t really much use either.  What we don&#39;t know is the &quot;why&quot; behind the inclusion of the versions of Opera in the Adobe applications.</p>
<p>I can see it being necessary depending on how the apps are written, but I would definitely not recommend removing them from the internal resources of the application bundle without knowing what they are used for.;;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alejandro Fernández</title>
		<link>http://arfore.com/2009/07/24/opera-was-installed-how/comment-page-1/#comment-941</link>
		<dc:creator>Alejandro Fernández</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 23:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arfore.com/?p=320#comment-941</guid>
		<description>The &quot;why&quot; behind the inclusion might be bucks to adobe to include them.

The another, and more &quot;humanitarian and desinterestedly&quot; &quot;why&quot; behind the inclusion is including Opera as another test bench in Dreamweaver.

For the same reason I don&#039;t undertand why don&#039;t they embed Mosaic, Netscape, all Shiternet Explorer versions as well as Android and Symbian browsers, maybe because they werent available at the time in Adobe&#039;s bank account. 

Who knows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;why&#8221; behind the inclusion might be bucks to adobe to include them.</p>
<p>The another, and more &#8220;humanitarian and desinterestedly&#8221; &#8220;why&#8221; behind the inclusion is including Opera as another test bench in Dreamweaver.</p>
<p>For the same reason I don&#8217;t undertand why don&#8217;t they embed Mosaic, Netscape, all Shiternet Explorer versions as well as Android and Symbian browsers, maybe because they werent available at the time in Adobe&#8217;s bank account. </p>
<p>Who knows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arfore</title>
		<link>http://arfore.com/2009/07/24/opera-was-installed-how/comment-page-1/#comment-940</link>
		<dc:creator>arfore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 18:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arfore.com/?p=320#comment-940</guid>
		<description>While the Adobe Uninstaller doesn&#039;t remove them, appzapper isn&#039;t really much use either.  What we don&#039;t know is the &quot;why&quot; behind the inclusion of the versions of Opera in the Adobe applications.

I can see it being necessary depending on how the apps are written, but I would definitely not recommend removing them from the internal resources of the application bundle without knowing what they are used for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While the Adobe Uninstaller doesn&#8217;t remove them, appzapper isn&#8217;t really much use either.  What we don&#8217;t know is the &#8220;why&#8221; behind the inclusion of the versions of Opera in the Adobe applications.</p>
<p>I can see it being necessary depending on how the apps are written, but I would definitely not recommend removing them from the internal resources of the application bundle without knowing what they are used for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Algafeba</title>
		<link>http://arfore.com/2009/07/24/opera-was-installed-how/comment-page-1/#comment-938</link>
		<dc:creator>Algafeba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 14:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arfore.com/?p=320#comment-938</guid>
		<description>1 - It installs two Opera Versions, 9.xx and 9.xx. 
2 - Adobe Uninstaller doesn&#039;t remove them, locate the fiels and use appzapper instead of the uninstaller.
3 - Tell Adobe their brainwork is leaking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1 &#8211; It installs two Opera Versions, 9.xx and 9.xx.<br />
2 &#8211; Adobe Uninstaller doesn&#8217;t remove them, locate the fiels and use appzapper instead of the uninstaller.<br />
3 &#8211; Tell Adobe their brainwork is leaking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arfore</title>
		<link>http://arfore.com/2009/07/24/opera-was-installed-how/comment-page-1/#comment-930</link>
		<dc:creator>arfore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 00:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arfore.com/?p=320#comment-930</guid>
		<description>The point is not whether the Opera install exists in the package or that it &quot;overrides&quot; any defaults, the problem is that it exists at all.

I could see including a browser in your package if the system had no browser installed, but almost any Mac these days is going to have at least Safari installed.

What really irks me though, is the fact that Spotlight is recognizing the existence of the &quot;hidden&quot; browser in the context menu choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The point is not whether the Opera install exists in the package or that it &#8220;overrides&#8221; any defaults, the problem is that it exists at all.</p>
<p>I could see including a browser in your package if the system had no browser installed, but almost any Mac these days is going to have at least Safari installed.</p>
<p>What really irks me though, is the fact that Spotlight is recognizing the existence of the &#8220;hidden&#8221; browser in the context menu choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

